Friday, December 13, 2013
Bad Government Guideline / Principles
we = the government (obv)
We are more concerned about the corporations not the demands of the constituents.
The constituents are of lower priority than the corporations.
The demands of a multinational corporation must be met.
The requests of the people should be disregarded.
We are okay with the corporations negatively affecting the people.
We cannot allow the people to negatively affect the corporations.
If your government clearly follows these principles - You Have A Bad Government
Thursday, December 05, 2013
Thursday, November 07, 2013
Tuesday, November 05, 2013
Where Is The Good Grammar? Do writing Standards Matter Any More?
In English class at a homosexually charged 'grammar' school..
I was taught not to insert a comma before a ‘but’ or an ‘and’...
Also, I was taught to write 'he was neat and tidy. Regularly cleaning..' instead of 'he was neat, tidy. Regularly clea...'
Yet still, I see paid writers/ journalists/ cheekys doing things like this all the time. The editors condone it...
Why Men Haven’t Been Looking At You
{{Applies primarily to life in a city.}}
"Why don't men look at me?!?"
"Why don't you look at men?"
A near
undeniable fact of life is that women walk around hoping for men to look at
them - better yet: "hope to not go unnoticed".
Many women
who are unfortunately saddled with unattractiveness are used to being undesired
and not getting admiring stares from men so are fine with not getting that sort
of attention. 'Attractive to some' or undeniably hot chicks on the other hand, get annoyed or actually feel sadness
if they walk past six men on the street and not one looks at them. It is the old
"affirmation of worth" (detailed soon) thing again.
Women are
heartily focused on feeling desired -- as men are with being able to provide.
The thing
is:
If it was okay to stare at every attractive woman most (even gay) men would do so--
looking at women all day, every day. But sadly, we can't and, out of respect, shouldn't.
1ONE
Not only is it seen as 'pervy' and embarrassing but it is rude to many people; a jealous scowling girl who happens to see you, a hater, a sister’s brother.
A woman in a belly top and
skinny jeans will ask "what are you looking at?". A question that one can unwisely answer with a flirty assertion (which would most likely be responded to with an expression of veiled /blatant offence or disregard) or blunt honesty which is never recommended.
Looking at women is less offensive and received with less displeasure in certain situations (e.g. in a nightclub, at a fashion show or on a beach).
When a man sees an attractive woman wearing tight 'jeggins', a face full of make up with her
breasts out, walking like she's on a catwalk, he shouldn't look too blatantly because ironically it seems evident that nobody wants him to. Of course, not everyone should do as they please.
A perusing
male must also be aware of the fact that certain women are forbidden from returning one's gaze; it is hopeless and possibly dangerous to attempt to exchange lustful gazes with Muslim women and others with unstable partners.
2TWO
A major majority of men will not, with sex in minds forefront, look longingly into the eyes of, smile at and/or attempt an introduction with an attractive woman
he passes on the street due to experience: nearly all previous unsolicited shows of
desire from the average man have been negatively received.
Some women scream, some try to ignore, some laugh but all end up looking away and disappearing never to be seen again, leaving bad tastes and bruisings behind them. The only men who don't feel like that have had numerous positive experiences when previously looking at or approaching women so are not afraid of another failed attempt at a flirty interaction. Understandably, they are the minuscule minority - even good looking guys want to save their egos.
Some women scream, some try to ignore, some laugh but all end up looking away and disappearing never to be seen again, leaving bad tastes and bruisings behind them. The only men who don't feel like that have had numerous positive experiences when previously looking at or approaching women so are not afraid of another failed attempt at a flirty interaction. Understandably, they are the minuscule minority - even good looking guys want to save their egos.
Often a man will find it difficult to look away from something beautiful that he will never touch or see again. Many men seek easier and less painful lives by never looking at such things.
When involving any kind of interaction, attempts to look at the majority of females are saddening (depressing), consistently bringing light to the fact that in reality the 'perving' male will only have a short list of sexual partners and intimate friendships (opposing his perhaps instinctual desire to have many), most if not all of which will be with less attractive women than those he could go outside to masochistically drool over.
Negatively received attempts at eye contact will, after a certain point, only give the man even more misery and compound his sadness. As will brush-offs, looks of disgust, embarrassment and ridicule, false 'I didn't see you's' (what we have to do too) and lead-ons.
It is not a confidence issue, it is about being logical and learning from previous experiences. Why would you go somewhere you've never been wanted?
1.5
1.5
Teenagers
are looking older than ever before so caution must be taken when spotting a
female at her physical peak, she could be underaged.., making the unknowing
observer a "paedophile" by peeping at what appears to be prime beef. You can never
be sure, the girl of your dreams that you just saw walking by with her tiny untouched tummy, long height and protruding booty might be 15 and actually up for it.
Despite
women evidently wanting to be looked at, the appreciation levels are even more
polarised when considering male/female spectators than they are with hot males/ugly guys;
most women care more about attention from other women than attention from
random males.
So.. Why men don't look at you...
Imagine a
huge room filled with gorgeous sports cars. Would you want to be in there if you
believed that you would never drive, let alone own, one of those wonderful
vehicles or anything like them? If yes, for how long? If no, would you even care?..
"Lady,
you aren't worth looking at, I can barely give you a returned greeting. You
won't give me anything and i'll just be looking at what I can't have, its
painful. Tell me... do you like window shopping?"
"Yes, I do actually"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4UWxlVvT1A
I request that all of you women be nicer to men, all men.. especially if you're available. Things will happen girl..
Monday, September 30, 2013
How To Listen To A Stutterer (Solved)
COMPREHENSION LESSON, LYRICAL WEAPO....
Understand
that speaking with a stammerer isn’t ever likely to be a normal conversation. The person that you speak with doesn’t converse or think of talking in the same way as a
fluent talker.
Sunday, September 01, 2013
All NHS Doctors Are Rubbish
I used to see doctors as supreme humans of superior intellect, capable of healing the world...
Friday, August 16, 2013
Odd Trains: Extortionate and Unfair Rail Services
SHORT AS
"Whoever... Is this fair?"
Journey A takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles
Journey B takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles
Journey A is under more demand, yet has the same train frequency and number of carriages as Journey B, which gets fewer passengers and less demand.
Journey A costs 34 coins to take
Journey B costs 14 coins to take
Does this make sense?
Why and how are these companies allowed to do this?
In 2008, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
a fifth more than the price of a single fare.
In 2012, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
the same as two singles.
"Pubic transport in Great Britain...."
"Whoever... Is this fair?"
Journey A takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles
Journey B takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles
Journey A is under more demand, yet has the same train frequency and number of carriages as Journey B, which gets fewer passengers and less demand.
Journey A costs 34 coins to take
Journey B costs 14 coins to take
Does this make sense?
Why and how are these companies allowed to do this?
In 2008, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
a fifth more than the price of a single fare.
In 2012, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
the same as two singles.
"Pubic transport in Great Britain...."
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Contactless Payments Coming Up!!! - Diabolical Secrets
UPDATE: It is now 12th June 2014 and there are voice announcements playing on the buses saying "Cash will no longer be accepted on buses"...
There is no reason for me to lie and there's no reason to not believe this (reverse as appropriate).
There is no reason for me to lie and there's no reason to not believe this (reverse as appropriate).
"Soo, an
insider source has told me that the privatised Transport for London is currently (8/2013) training
their staff to work with and administer 'Contactless Payment' scheduled to be
in use "by 2016."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)