Teachers Are Responsible For Students Growth

Just think of how many children go through school unhelped, leaving with problems and inadequacies that could have been remedied with a quick ironing-out by one of their teachers. The fact is that teachers have the ability to make their students better. Practically all teachers have the ability to make all of their students great at a subject - but that cannot be allowed to make sense.

If a student leaves the classroom or course still unable to understand related concepts, the teacher is as responsible for the failures as much as the student is. The teacher can change the student, a good one always does. The students are capable of teaching themselves, but then what are the teachers for?.. Great schools have great teachers. Great schools do not have bad teachers. Good teachers do not have bad students for long. Bad students are made good by good teachers. Bad students are the product of bad teachers, just as good students do not need a good teacher to be good. Bad students do not make good teachers bad. They are the teacher’s test.

Keep admonishing responsibility.

Religion Is A Joke

How European Immigrants Behave In England - Examples Of Antisocial Negatives

More to come..

SOME JOBS ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR IMMIGRANTS ?!

I recently had a zero-hour work experience of a factory setting in central London, where the immigrant staffing (95%) incessantly communicated their belief that those ‘fair-paying’ factory jobs belonged only to them – immigrants.

A mention must be made of the fact that, on average, immigrants are typically more satisfied with lower living expenditures, work benefits, wages and amount of time off. It’s not only ego that pushes natives away from such physically and emotionally demanding positions. It is certainly not laziness, as other commentators would have you believe.

Governments Force People Into Crime + Poverty

Governments are supposed to support the people they rule over. Actually, the people are supposed to rule over their governments... but oh well, everything is wrong and futile. It's even 'wrong' to say that things are 'wrong'... Everything that is 'right', fair or decent, has opposition that uses superior levels of effort to argue against wishes, dreams and happiness.

Due to govern-mental neglect, individuals are left to be unemployed and homeless. While there are solutions, none are in place. Justice systems continue to serve the rich while damning the poor. Jobcenters do not help people to get jobs. The publications provide propaganda and lies.

Mr Victim has been forced into violently mugging people, stealing and dealing... because despite any of his efforts, he cannot get a job anywhere and would be sleeping on the streets if he was not a criminal. The government gives him no assistance, only the threat of imprisonment. For him under the government's hateful neglect, being homeless is a crime and employment is a factual impossibility.

Governments, fairly, want people to work and governments do not want them to rely on benefits / social security. So, the solution is to make sure everyone is working. Leaving individuals to find work on their own is silly, because too many people CANNOT find work. So, to keep them away from 'benefits' ENSURE THAT THEY HAVE JOBS.

If the government forced a job placement system, homelessness and poverty would not exist. Despite the benefits and plausibility of such a notion, it is fervently denied; Because rich people won't be happy...

This world is a joke... about which, only the heartless can laugh...

10 Obvious Ways Employers Are Clearly Unfair + Illogical

Of course, many aspects of the entries below are fair, I'll focus on the unfair and illogical aspects. In desperation, as I adapt this from another article.






You aren't very savvy on social media (ME TOO) 


When ...social media is more media than it is social. ....broadcast to unforeseen audiences. Employers will Google you and look you up on social media sites... more than 40% of companies said they have turned down candidates based on what they see on their social profiles.... looked up a candidate ...wearing only a sock. (Not on his foot.) Your profile picture isn't private.A sales manager shared a story .... brilliant resume who interviewed well,.. didn't get the job because he was smoking or holding a bong in what seemed like every photo ever taken....


Why are you judging people on who they are as individuals? Why must they adhere to a rigid outline of a quintessentially 'boring' person? When Facebook and Google accounts didn't exist, did you benevolent employers hire private investigators to look into your applicants personal lives simply for additional reasons to not give them jobs? What are you hoping to find from looking at Facebook profiles? 

Should someone put up a false character image/impression on Facebook for all of their true friends to be confused by? Is a picture of a man and a dog better than a woman with three cats? Is it fair for employment to not be awarded on an objective basis?

Is It Too Late For UKIP To Do Anything?

Despite the lack of a fully-fleshed and multifaceted proposal, UKIP have picked up support seemingly solely due to the validity and resonance of their main argument; that of the negative effects of immigration.

It seems that the populace believes that the issues UKIP consistently relies on (immigration and the EU) are the most important as of now, rewarding UKIP with roughly a 30% share in the 22/05/14 'local election' constituency votes.

If UKIP is to provide the main populace with what they are wishing the party would provide for their votes, their governmental reign must result in:

• The UK leaving the EU completely or having limited ties similar to those of Switzerland. Mandatory
• The majority of European and other economic migrants (not asylum) being deported, freeing up millions of jobs, services and resources. Mandatory
• UK's borders and immigration policies being changed to ensure that traversal is extremely exclusive, finally only allowing 'a trickle'. Mandatory
• Possible implementation of priority system for public services such as NHS, housing, benefits and job acquisition.

These points would be proved with a psuedo-democratic referendum that allowed the population to define and vote for exactly what they really want to happen with their country.

"We want Idi Amin!!"

If these things are not to be executed, what did people vote UKIP for? The 4 things above are needed in order for the political and social ailments that have been wrought by the ConDem crew and immigration to be truly cured. 

Everything will stay the same as it is now; all or most of the problems voters have now will remain after UKIP takes office, due to such challenging tasks.

I think it is too late and that not all of the 4 aforementioned notions will become reality. If the party does get to lead (which they wont) UKIP will disappoint the public's expectations, fading away in the next general election with a furore of discontent.

PROOF AGAINST IMMIGRATION http://sosickofthislife.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/lying-uk-government-loves-eu.html

4 UNDER-PUBLICISED BENEFITS TO EU INCLUSION / INVASION

Bad Government Guideline / Principles

we = the government (obv)

We are more concerned about the corporations not the demands of the constituents.
The constituents are of lower priority than the corporations.

The demands of a multinational corporation must be met.
The requests of the people should be disregarded.

We are okay with the corporations negatively affecting the people.
We cannot allow the people to negatively affect the corporations.


If your government clearly follows these principles - You Have A Bad Government