Showing posts with label uk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uk. Show all posts

Sunday, April 26, 2020

What Do The UK and England Think About Black Lives Matter?

This 2016 Viewsbank poll of 2165 individuals **who can use the internet and would sign up to a penny poll website** asked about the #BlackLivesMatter movement in the UK and revealed that:
  • Just over 1 in 3 respondents agree with the cause.
  • Just under a quarter of respondents claim to know nothing about it.
  • Just over a quarter of respondents do not care about the cause.
  • One in 7 respondents are racist haters who are against the cause.

Monday, July 20, 2015

More Proof That UK's Government Doesn't Care


People looking for housing assistance get given cardboard folders packed with sheets of information intended as guidance.

Still giving out information packs that state on every page: ‘Updated 2012’ at the end of 2014 to members of the public inquiring about housing, the numerous changes and cuts to the housing, benefits and assistance systems that are now in effect aren't even accounted for.

The government expects people to stumble upon these new roadblocks as they go, on the outdated promises of certain funding and services that were actually made completely unavailable last year.

The government doesn't care enough to update the information they give to people in need.

Not telling them that things are actually slightly different and much harder than they were, even if you are a mother with a child, the UK government changes things but doesn't change their documentation of it for more than 2 YEARS.

However, London exists in a fundamentally different state to the rest of England so... I DUNNO.

Thursday, July 16, 2015

D-Raw - Banana Boat Rap mixtape review

Here is a review of an underground UK hiphop mixtape (Yes! You got one!!) by a certified hustler called D-Raw.

Friday, May 23, 2014

Is It Too Late For UKIP To Do Anything?

Despite the lack of a fully-fleshed and multifaceted proposal, UKIP have picked up support seemingly solely due to the validity and resonance of their main argument; that of the negative effects of immigration.
It seems that the populace believes that the issues UKIP consistently relies on (immigration and the EU) are the most important as of now, rewarding UKIP with roughly a 30% share in the 22/05/14 'local election' constituency votes.
If UKIP is to provide the main populace with what they are wishing the party would provide for their votes, their governmental reign must result in:
  • The UK leaving the EU completely or having limited ties similar to those of Switzerland. Mandatory
  • The majority of European and other economic migrants (not asylum) being deported, freeing up millions of jobs, services and resources. Mandatory
  • UK's borders and immigration policies being changed to ensure that traversal is extremely exclusive, finally only allowing 'a trickle'. Mandatory
  • Possible implementation of priority system for public services such as NHS, housing, benefits and job acquisition.
These points would be proved with a psuedo-democratic referendum that allowed the population to define and vote for exactly what they really want to happen with their country.
"We want Idi Amin!!"
If these things are not to be executed, what did people vote UKIP for? The 4 things above are needed in order for the political and social ailments that have been wrought by the ConDem crew and immigration to be truly cured. 
Everything will stay the same as it is now; all or most of the problems voters have now will remain after UKIP takes office, due to such challenging tasks.
I think it is too late and that not all of the 4 aforementioned notions will become reality. If the party does get to lead (which they wont) UKIP will disappoint the public's expectations, fading away in the next general election with a furore of discontent.

PROOF AGAINST IMMIGRATION http://sosickofthislife.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/lying-uk-government-loves-eu.html

4 UNDER-PUBLICISED BENEFITS TO EU INCLUSION / INVASION

Saturday, January 04, 2014

Can We Leave The EU Please?

Reported amount of deficit debt
£80 Billion+

2011
Amount England gave to the EU :
£19 .7 Billion+

2011
Amount England saved with all the nasty budget cuts :
£6.2 Billion-

Percentage of all Alcohol Tax paid in the EU that comes from the UK
57%

2011
Ratio of new jobs given to European and other immigrants :
1:2

2012
Conservative reported UK unemployment figure
2.56 Million+

Amount of Europeans freely migrated into the UK since 2007
15 Million+

Being tied to the EU limits a country from trading freely and fairly.

The country with the richest people (av.) in Europe is also the one with the least ties and bindings to the EU; Switzerland.

WE NEED TO LEAVE, sorry.... thanks, the food was great....

Friday, August 16, 2013

Odd Trains: Extortionate and Unfair Rail Services

SHORT AS

"Whoever... Is this fair?"

Journey A takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles
Journey B takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles

Journey A is under more demand, yet has the same train frequency and number of carriages as Journey B, which gets fewer passengers and less demand.

Journey A costs 34 coins to take
Journey B costs 14 coins to take

Does this make sense?
Why and how are these companies allowed to do this?

In 2008, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
a fifth more than the price of a single fare.
In 2012, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
the same as two singles.

"Pubic transport in Great Britain...."

Friday, August 02, 2013

4 BENEFITS / REASONS FOR THE (EASTERN AND ALL) EUROPEAN INVASION

Over 30 Million British people feel that the European invasion is a bad thing but the occupation/theft has a few benefits..

Push for education and employment

The unending droves of “educated” European immigrants coming over and entering roles without lining them up before getting on the plane sends a message to the nationals about education, 'if you want a job you must go and get trained up'.

Experience is required more than ever before, no more are the days of being able to go to an employer requesting a job and the necessary but not-too-hard training, unless an apprenticeship, only available to under-24's, is miraculously acquired. Why is experience needed to stack shelves?

Many British citizens applying for 'quick' certifications in immigrant saturated professions such as security or construction (the most popular ones requiring only a few weeks of observing to complete) will find that their mandatory criminal records bureau (CRB) checks will bring up petty misdemeanours that render them ineligible. Fortunately, an immigrant can easily falsify their difficult to check history regarding both crime and experience.

Somehow most of these new European people have qualifications and/or plenty of satisfactory experience unlike many nationals,1 in 2 newly opened positions goes to an immigrant. With EE's filling up most of the lower and un-skilled roles, a lower chance of employment for nationals will result in greater demand for education and training. In addition, regularly being unable to understand people promotes the learning of other languages.

This increased demand will benefit the training and certification industry, eventually bringing an increase to governmental tax receipts and more stolen and wasted money.


Pleasing the EU and receiving those benefits

A few liberals argue that without immigration this country would halt in broken disarray. This notion was only true at certain times in history, e.g. after world wars, but is logically untrue today. During and after consecutive recessions and a poorly hidden employment crisis with, as well as other methods used by our government, large numbers being signed off from the unemployment register by being allocated part time positions by government and EU funded organisations, such large numbers of immigrants are certainly making life here harder for everyone outside of ‘big business’.

If open immigration was curtailed there would be many changes and transitions but none would be catastrophic; although immigration will always cause numbers and demand to increase, growing economies and infrastructures by force, development is possible in all circumstances, especially with the "superior minds of the British". 

Complex are the full terms of agreement between the EU and the British Government but it is clear and stated that the borders of England and its valuable benefits are no longer under British control and are freely open to more than half a billion Europeans. There must be some extraordinarily valuable benefit to being in the EU, so presumably this mass migration, along with a long list of other sacrificial obligations, ensures its receipt. The government and media keeps telling the public that there are financial benefits to EU inclusion -- if that is true, what happened to Spain or Greece?

All cuts are offset by increased demand. There are a few EU benefits in plain view such as funding for community services and large business investments but are England’s receipts bigger than her contributions?


Raise usage of businesses and open spaces

As ‘foreigners’ lounge blissfully on the previously underused benches strewn around, talking loud and drinking beer in public places, simply enjoying their surroundings with touristic novelty, things look very different. Previously, park benches were used mostly by school kids and alcoholics. This display of appreciation should make the British-born see their invaded country in a different light, as a place to utilise and enjoy as the immigrants do.

Local businesses thrive from a wealth of customers whilst riversides, parks and local entertainment businesses such as tours, museums and theatres are seeing increasing numbers of admissions. Neighbourhoods in England are more bustling in the daytime than ever before, if unfortunately with a lack of unified community and universal rapport. Despite the fact that, while accounting for only 20% of England's total population, 4 in 10 murder or rape suspects were born elsewhere -- surprisingly less at 1 in 3 in the cities -- the streets are thankfully being used more due to immigration, which is good.


Whiter immigrants and the future

The pale ‘caucasian’ division in England has been drifting uncomfortably away from a majority status, with “Others” floating over 50% and London only having 44% 'white' English in 2011. Without the current mass European immigration, the next generation of Brits would consist mostly of darker skinned people, changing the face, image and agenda of Europe's loudest country.

Before the mass European migration, It was expected that, in a few decades, British 'whites' would be the smallest racial demographic nationwide. In 2012, ‘whites’ were the minority in a number of places with 2 in every 5 public schools in London having an Asian majority and 44% nationwide having ‘non-white’ majorities. Many areas of England's cities are vigilante-policed by groups known as the 'Paki Panthers'. That is a secret.

England’s population has been progressing increasingly 'non-white' over the past 60 years, not decidedly a bad thing, so the recent influx of European 'whiteness' acts as a "safeguard". The majority of these immigrants are likely to be bothered to learn the language, pay taxes and integrate into 'big society' instead of burrowing into discriminating communities, cultural ignorance and untaxed finance. Also, a 'whiter' next generation will give the British government more of a reason to care about it's people.


These particular immigrants are an issue that we will be forced to endure and deal with in the most positive way.


SHARE THIS SHITEY GARBAGE

http://sosickofthislife.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/lying-uk-government-loves-eu.html


England

Saturday, July 27, 2013

I Heart Boston, UK


Boston, Massachusetts in America was the last place in America that abolished segregation. Boston had the first ever US public school in 1635 and the first American subway in 1897. It was named Boston after the British town, in remembrance of respected and revered colonists.

Boston in Lincolnshire, England has been allowed to become overrun by Polish, Bulgarian, Lithuanian and other European immigrants. A quarter of Boston’s population is of retirement age, on last decades census there was less than 35,000 residents. Today, tiny Boston has at least 60,000 people residing, at least 20,000 europeans have been allowed to invade and reside resulting in a third of the English town’s population being European immigrants. Its modest high street has 70% of its local business shops owned by European immigrants.
The town has more than 185 places to learn english.




Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Chill Out on the Benefits Cap

People love to get new things to complain about..

The monkey-brained British government, probably at the influence of the EU, have decided to introduce a limit onto how much money social security receivers can receive. Isn't that something that should have already been in place?

An issue is that the misplaced public outcry is unreasonable: the cap is likely to be a maximum of £500 a week for couples with or without children and £350 a week for single people. These amounts of dough are what most people work for and the impoverished dream about, the concessions provided by benefit eligibility make these values even more sustaining than they appear to be.

At the most lenient these amounts should only be warranted by receivers having something like 12 kids...which is unacceptable carelessness anyway.

These 'caps' only serve to highlight the incentive to receive benefits and stay out of work as opposed to scare people into it...our government is wasting their efforts.

Instead of uniting about nothing....