Showing posts with label good. Show all posts
Showing posts with label good. Show all posts
Saturday, February 13, 2016
What Really Is 'God'?
Put simply, resultant from reality's applications of the concept, God is a conceptualisation of Goodness occurring. If bad stuff happens, the event is either a lapse in Goodness' control or good in Goodness' judgement, as if for the 'greater good'. 'God' can only be good in activity, because believers would be hopeless if he was not. Therefore...
Saturday, January 04, 2014
Will Reading Make You Smarter?
You know the type: up themselves, well spoken, calm and always with a book. Are they as smart as they think they are? Is a book-reader automatically more intelligent than couch potato or someone who's book-shy?
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
A Better Justice System
I know, I know that
I should be hopeless about huge reforms of any law system. Too convoluted to
edit, it seems that the law-books can only be expanded.
Monday, July 15, 2013
Positive Stereotypes (And Negative)
We all know that 'we should be against stereotypes' but many stereotypes are actually fine and dandy with the 'victims', --appreciated-- when positive.
Stereotypes: (noun) Socially common misconceptions and false generalisations that are typically degrading and damaging.
Stereotypes: (noun) Socially common misconceptions and false generalisations that are typically degrading and damaging.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Chill Out on the Benefits Cap
People love to get new things to complain about..
The monkey-brained British government, probably at the influence of the EU, have decided to introduce a limit onto how much money social security receivers can receive. Isn't that something that should have already been in place?
An issue is that the misplaced public outcry is unreasonable: the cap is likely to be a maximum of £500 a week for couples with or without children and £350 a week for single people. These amounts of dough are what most people work for and the impoverished dream about, the concessions provided by benefit eligibility make these values even more sustaining than they appear to be.
At the most lenient these amounts should only be warranted by receivers having something like 12 kids...which is unacceptable carelessness anyway.
These 'caps' only serve to highlight the incentive to receive benefits and stay out of work as opposed to scare people into it...our government is wasting their efforts.
Instead of uniting about nothing....
The monkey-brained British government, probably at the influence of the EU, have decided to introduce a limit onto how much money social security receivers can receive. Isn't that something that should have already been in place?
An issue is that the misplaced public outcry is unreasonable: the cap is likely to be a maximum of £500 a week for couples with or without children and £350 a week for single people. These amounts of dough are what most people work for and the impoverished dream about, the concessions provided by benefit eligibility make these values even more sustaining than they appear to be.
At the most lenient these amounts should only be warranted by receivers having something like 12 kids...which is unacceptable carelessness anyway.
These 'caps' only serve to highlight the incentive to receive benefits and stay out of work as opposed to scare people into it...our government is wasting their efforts.
Instead of uniting about nothing....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
