Showing posts with label computers taking all our jobs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label computers taking all our jobs. Show all posts

Friday, May 20, 2016

UKIP BREXIT PROPAGANDA - 2016 VOTE

A leaflet/PSA that UKIP sent out, in it's millions, to counteract the Pro-EU  propaganda sent out by Cameron's Tory government leading up to the EU referendum vote. 

If the majority vote is to stay in it will be nice to look back on the things that the masses chose to ignore. 

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Mono-Living Is For Stupid Knobheads - Mark Zuckerberg

I've just found out about a new craze / fad proceeding through 'smart' people. Because of sheep-tendencies, Mark Zuckerberg's (Facebook founder) completely blank outfitting of a grey t-shirt and jeans (because he doesn't want or need anyone's approval or opinion) has extended into a life-choice mantra for the masses. Mono-living is the new black, meaning: wearing and / or doing the same things, routinely and without fail, to deny oneself the wastefully painful burden of choice. I'm serious. What is this??

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Religion Is A Joke (Part 13/100)

The prophet said to the evolved-man:
"I know your mind is 2000 years less primitive (more advanced) than mine, yet I still believe that you should follow my teachings."

"If you don't follow me, remembering that I am a 'wise' man from 2000 years ago serving old-time fables who still thinks Earth is flat, you will be punished for eternity"

"You'd better believe me"

Friday, June 12, 2015

A Memo 4 Noisy Commuters on Public Transport

Shut the Hell UP!!!
You are trading in your consideration for strangers as well as many people's happiness, simply for the chance for your irrelevant and worthless trivia to be heard by all. I don't even understand your fucking language!!
Everyone without headphones on is suffering, because of you, your disgusting language and your ape-like mouth noises.
Why are you shouting when you don't have to? Surely, on most calls, you can still be heard by who you are talking to if you aren't shouting - just speak quietly.
Up against all of the things that one could possibly be talking about, compassion for others should be of some importance.
When compassion is a factor, such as when your group (Loudies) is in public, at the very least, it should be of effect. 
If you can communicate quietly, arguably with more effectiveness, you must be a moron not to do so.
Twat.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Man Roles Feminists Don't Want

I could say a lot about this topic but, this time, I'll keep it limited to roles in employment.

Women, now, are of the opinion that there should be no division or difference in the vocational utility of either sex. They are now supposed to be equal to men in every way - bar intelligence, with which they swiftly claim superiority.

The truth is: women are happy to take a man's job, but only if it's not too physically hard.
A sort of imbalance..

They are eager to be bosses, secretaries, office workers, retail clerks, dentists etc. But despite 'equality', there are still many roles that women just don't or shouldn't want to do. The roles that they happily leave to men..

Only SSOTL...

So in the struggle for equality, they discovered that they don't really want it..

Someone tell me a job that only women do.. Don't say mothering.... Nope, not stripping, not midwifery.. nada... Not even childminding.. A little sorry..

Men will do any and all jobs, I understand that in the third world, women do all jobs and the concept of feminism isn't so widespread or accepted. Out there you can easily find a female road sweeper. Not in a western city. In the army, although women are welcome, they are seldom seen on the frontline - actually fighting.

For obvious but denied reasons, women do not do physically strenuous jobs, e.g lifting heavy objects for twelve hour shifts, window cleaning, night-shift security, home-visit plumbing or digging holes labouring. Or... Doing furniture removals or mining.

Women believe that they belong in a nice warm office, sitting down talking all day (or on a shop floor doing similar activities) and that men should be doing the stuff that they don't want to do. Breaking backs and getting dirty. Their excuse is.... Childbirth.

Men believe that we can all do the same jobs but, out of compassion, some jobs are too physically hard for women.

They're nearly the same thing..

The sexes are of equal mental capability but not in terms of physical capability. So, in relation to employment, the two groups are not identical and equality is impossible.

Feminism? What did you say?

I know I am a dick.. When I can.

SSOTL baby
"Consider the recovery time needed for hard physical roles. If a job can only be done for 4 days out of the seven in a week, due to the need for three days of recovery time for the body, tell me why it shouldn't pay as much as five days of an easier job of similar value?"

In a scenario where a group of men and a group of women are working in the same organisation but the male group is doing hard physical work requiring muscle, strain, high risk and lots of energy while the female group is doing the easier, less strenuous work that should largely involve sitting down.. Is it fair that they get paid the same amount? Even if you somehow work out who's making more money for the company. About as fair as management types getting paid 10 times what regular staff do.  Actually, no, that's totally more unfair than the hardest jobs being left to the men, with no condoned or implemented pay difference.

With an enforced equality in mind - How would the feminists react if women were, by default, made to do the most strenuous, gruelling and painful roles and received the same pay as the men who were allocated to the easier jobs?

What's the tagline of this site again..

Would you expect the dispatcher ladies on the police radios to get paid the same salary as the cops out there raping peoples lives away ?

Monday, February 16, 2015

Powwownow Advert Is Offensive and Depressingly Stupid - Avoid The Horror



'It' says, 'AVOID THE HORROR' = Make your next meeting a conference call!!!!

In the dystopian future that we in England are living in, where random people cannot even look at eachother for more than a second without causing discomfort and offence, this is not helpful to see above and beside commuter's heads on crowded public transport.

In the image above, 'the others' are Serial Killers and in other prints they are Clowns.

The self ingraining message is: All other people are clowns and serial killers and it is a nightmare to be around them.

It's another deep-sinking message that says that everyone else is incompatible with you. Compounding the matching understandings and logical deductions wrought from religion, tradition, fashion, race and class.

That we should all hate eachother. That, in all areas outside of love, it is better for us to not interact physically, let's just rely on computers!!

Everyone would look perceptive, as they communicate only with their phones, if they were to wear t-shirts with 'INCOMPATIBLE' or 'STAY AWAY FROM ME!!' printed on their fronts.

Even if the depressing advertisement was not intended to be offensive, which I doubt, it's most present effects on the minds of observing commuters are undeniably negative. I'm not alone in my disgust, three words: Beloved Burns Victims

What mindless advertising work!!


Their excuse
https://www.powwownow.co.uk/blog/news/time-avoid-horror/

Friday, February 21, 2014

Solution For Digitalization?


The expectation now is that by 2020 European nations such as France, England and Portugal will have riots and social uprising due to the effects of digitalization (computers taking peoples jobs to point of displacement of the majority of people).

Mass scale riots and rebellion would be good and very very bad.

This fear and reality of humans being displaced by computers is undeniably caused by rich devils, choosing to make themselves and their companies more money by saving it and making it easier with the use of computers.

One coder could create, every year, software instructions that would replace the utility of thousands of humans. 

Surely, one way to prevent this 'inevitable' scenario would be to utilise law. I'm no lawyer but I'm sure that there are ethical requirements for organisations to adhere to.

Surely, Unions can take companies to Court for unethical business practices. If a multinational company, that makes upwards of $10 Billion annually, desires to make 100,000 people redundant to save $2 Billion a year... Is that ethical? Do law systems allow this?