Showing posts with label digitalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label digitalization. Show all posts

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Religion Is A Joke (Part 12/100)

The term ‘religious war’ describes wars with religion as the primary motive. Wars in which religion is a secondary motivation are not classified with ‘religious war’ but still have religion involved.

War, the unending question against faith, is a negative aspect of our collective-reality. It provokes us all to believe in something more than humanity and its idiosyncrasies.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Feminism's Redeeming Quality


I can't say that I am against feminism, but it's easy to see why people are sick of the concept's effects and advertisements. Feminism attempts to change one of the fundamental elements of society and human interaction so is detrimental in many ways to other elements (nope..not today).

Feminism is: Strengthening women as individuals and allowing them to think of themselves as more capable of independence from men. It has become acceptable for a woman to financially support a man and be in a man's traditional position.

This Western development, to add to the long list, has rendered the archaic practices of the East / Asian / African parts of the world even more dissatisfying. ONE UP!!

It's great that women can have their idea of fair.

I, as a righteous and considerate emasculated male, will always be pleased to see happiness and freedom, regardless of its detractions.
So, am I a Feminist?

Friday, February 21, 2014

Solution For Digitalization?


The expectation now is that by 2020 European nations such as France, England and Portugal will have riots and social uprising due to the effects of digitalization (computers taking peoples jobs to point of displacement of the majority of people).

Mass scale riots and rebellion would be good and very very bad.

This fear and reality of humans being displaced by computers is undeniably caused by rich devils, choosing to make themselves and their companies more money by saving it and making it easier with the use of computers.

One coder could create, every year, software instructions that would replace the utility of thousands of humans. 

Surely, one way to prevent this 'inevitable' scenario would be to utilise law. I'm no lawyer but I'm sure that there are ethical requirements for organisations to adhere to.

Surely, Unions can take companies to Court for unethical business practices. If a multinational company, that makes upwards of $10 Billion annually, desires to make 100,000 people redundant to save $2 Billion a year... Is that ethical? Do law systems allow this?