Women Are Nuts + The Root Cause Of The World's Problems

Just think about it...

Who decides what type of men are supported and continued across generations?

10 Proofs Collective De-Melanated People Are The Devil Incarnate

Unlike about Maria O-rsic. You must have heard.

So many times has it been said that ‘white people are the devil’. That statement may be undeniably true if you consider the reality of the world – yesterday, today and tomorrow. The ‘devil’ description applies to not just ‘Europeans’ but all pale ‘Asians’ – even those not provided decadence.

In the nation of Islam, a dictrine that I do not subscribe to primarily due to its racist and nonsensical nature, there is the tale of Yakub. Voyaging over millenia, this story suggests the inception and purpose of the creation of 'white' people. While fantastical, its an interesting story and matches up with a lot of what is seen today. The Albanoids of the story should pertain to not just 'white' Europeans but also pale Asians.

Following are ten points for the rationale and cause for disdain that may reasonably result in remedial action.

1. Pursuing the Creation of Destruction – Who decided to take knowledge born of academic progression and then create atomic bombs, railguns, viruses, toxic mining and other deathly destructive things with it? Everything that could be used for good is weaponized.

This is What 'White' Culture is Today #YT 20+ Awful Horrible Traits

Why are you NOT angry too?

This is precisely what mainstream and niche western 'white' people's cultures appear like to the outside / alternative perspective. Of course, this is shear generalisation, but generalisation is quite accurate when done correctly and without malice aforethought.

Who hates killing and death again?

The Main Problem with Interracial Relationships - featuring Chris Brown

 Okay, so I know this is a very complicated topic but I shall try to simplify it.

Why Fear Of Muslims / Islam Is Only Logical + 'Black' People + Ukraine

Just as with homophobia, people don't like to apply objective thinking to touchy subjects such as Islamophobia.

Without 'White' People We Wouldnt Have These Things (Syc)

These are most/all of the things that moronic racists, even unknowing ones (most people), believe that we would all be without if ‘white’ people didn’t exist.

                                    Agree Y/N

Chemistry                                                       Advanced Math / Physics + Algorithms

Civilisation                                                     Photography

Processed Food                                               Peace

Toilet paper                                                     Psychology

Electromagnetism                                           International Events

Technology + Nano iterations (Fridges, Planes, Microwaves, Washing Machines, Internet. Etc.)

Democracy                                                      Space (in general) ;)

The more reasonable deduction is that all of these areas of understanding and other things above are inevitable developments. Their experimental discovery and progressive utilisation is a result of an industrial-academic culture being undisturbed and henceforth allowed to evolve. This academic / intellectual culture is one that can be employed to great benefit all over the world, that’s why it seems like such a gift.

The fact that ‘whites’ were the ‘leading’ bearers of technological development between the 15^th and 20^th centuries does not mean that they were the only ones who would have been able to do what was done. Besides, they weren’t. People of all nationalities contributed to the impressive technological and scientific developments of the past few centuries. Honestly, the highly applauded work of the great mathematicians, such as Euler, Euclid, Gauss, Archimedes, Fermat and Newton, could have been (and was) done by anyone with enough interest, resources, focus and self-belief. Ramanujan (1887) is surely proof enough.

Involved in this equation of person-based development were (and are) things other than a fantastical superiority gene in ‘whites’... too many to mention here. Any ‘people type’ that was able to industrialise their society, those without wars and without carelessness for academia, were working on advanced scientific conjecturing of some sort. This is proven by artifacts of many eras.

The argument can be made that ‘whites’ were the catalyst for increased development, but it would have to account for cultural, political and ecological differences which would self-defeat the ulterior argument of intrinsic superiority. 

Another argument seems more revealing; The development of anything logical is incremental and exponential until completion so - at later points in time, the rate of growth grows to dwarf previous rates, there is no way to argue against the citing that ‘whites’ came 'on top' at a good time in the road of human understanding. 

Documented discoveries, in an old-historical context, should not be relied on to determine the true time of discovery, just the documented time. Of course, our records are better today. Yet, there were many times before, which we know nothing of. So, how can we judge.

I’ll end there… Get on top of things. Understand what is untold. Like they did...

Religion Is A Joke (part 15/100)

Hold This L

3 Stupid Lies We Love To Teach / Accept & Why

This blog \ site is built around the stupid stuff that humans tend to do, here is an article\post that mentions three of those things.

It could be said that I am doing stupid things, I wouldn't be human if I wasn't. Maintaining a site which society is unable to accept, refusing to share it and not splitting up long articles. I'm doing this so I don't go to jail for my actions or physically hurt anyone.

Man Roles Feminists Don't Want

I could say a lot about this topic but, this time, I'll keep it limited to roles in employment.

Women, now, are of the opinion that there should be no division or difference in the vocational utility of either sex. They are now supposed to be equal to men in every way - bar intelligence, with which they swiftly claim superiority.

The truth is: women are happy to take a man's job, but only if it's not too physically hard.

A sort of imbalance..

They are eager to be bosses, secretaries, office workers, retail clerks, dentists etc. But despite 'equality', there are still many roles that women just don't or shouldn't want to do. The roles that they happily leave to men..

Only SSOTL...

So in the struggle for equality, they discovered that they don't really want it..

Someone tell me a job that only women do.. Don't say mothering.... Nope, not stripping, not midwifery.. nada... Not even childminding.. A little sorry..

Men will do any and all jobs, I understand that in the third world, women do all jobs and the concept of feminism isn't so widespread or accepted. Out there you can easily find a female road sweeper. Not in a western city. In the army, although women are welcome, they are seldom seen on the frontline - actually fighting.

For obvious but denied reasons, women do not do physically strenuous jobs, e.g lifting heavy objects for twelve hour shifts, window cleaning, night-shift security, home-visit plumbing or digging holes labouring. Or... Doing furniture removals or mining.

Women believe that they belong in a nice warm office, sitting down talking all day (or on a shop floor doing similar activities) and that men should be doing the stuff that they don't want to do. Breaking backs and getting dirty. Their excuse is.... Childbirth.

Men believe that we can all do the same jobs but, out of compassion, some jobs are too physically hard for women.

They're nearly the same thing..

The sexes are of equal mental capability but not in terms of physical capability. So, in relation to employment, the two groups are not identical and equality is impossible.

Feminism? What did you say?

I know I am a dick.. When I can.

SSOTL baby

.

Check These Out:

Fallacy Of CharityThe Real Truth About The Latest London Tube StrikesIdentify an Idiot - It Could be YouEuropean Poverty is Not the Same

The text below does not exist:

"Consider the recovery time needed for hard physical roles. If a job can only be done for 4 days out of the seven in a week, due to the need for three days of recovery time for the body, tell me why it shouldn't pay as much as five days of an easier job of similar value?"

In a scenario where a group of men and a group of women are working in the same organisation but the male group is doing hard physical work requiring muscle, strain, high risk and lots of energy while the female group is doing the easier, less strenuous work that should largely involve sitting down.. Is it fair that they get paid the same amount? Even if you somehow work out who's making more money for the company. About as fair as management types getting paid 10 times what regular staff do.  Actually, no, that's totally more unfair than the hardest jobs being left to the men, with no condoned or implemented pay difference.

With an enforced equality in mind - How would the feminists react if women were, by default, made to do the most strenuous, gruelling and painful roles and received the same pay as the men who were allocated to the easier jobs?

What's the tagline of this site again..

Would you expect the dispatcher ladies on the police radios to get paid the same salary as the cops out there raping peoples lives away ?

Countries That Don't Have Traffic Lights WTF?!

Maybe not having any traffic lights is not that bad of a thing.

Why Ugly / Unattractive Girls Dont Go For Hot Men

Picture Precious (for a moment please)

For those who don't know...

Lying UK Government Loves The EU - Proof Against Immigration

Governments seem to always oppose public perception. Skewing statistics and disregarding elephants.