Teachers Are Responsible For Students Growth

Just think of how many children go through school unhelped, leaving with problems and inadequacies that could have been remedied with a quick ironing-out by one of their teachers. The fact is that teachers have the ability to make their students better. Practically all teachers have the ability to make all of their students great at a subject - but that cannot be allowed to make sense.

If a student leaves the classroom or course still unable to understand related concepts, the teacher is as responsible for the failures as much as the student is. The teacher can change the student, a good one always does. The students are capable of teaching themselves, but then what are the teachers for?.. Great schools have great teachers. Great schools do not have bad teachers. Good teachers do not have bad students for long. Bad students are made good by good teachers. Bad students are the product of bad teachers, just as good students do not need a good teacher to be good. Bad students do not make good teachers bad. They are the teacher’s test.

Keep admonishing responsibility.

Religion Is A Joke

Without 'White' People We Wouldnt Have These Things (Syc)

These are most/all of the things that moronic racists, even unknowing ones (most people), believe that we would all be without if ‘white’ people didn’t exist.

                                    Agree Y/N

Chemistry                                                       Advanced Math / Physics + Algorithms

Civilisation                                                     Photography

Processed Food                                               Peace

Toilet paper                                                     Psychology

Electromagnetism                                           International Events

Technology + Nano iterations (Fridges, Planes, Microwaves, Washing Machines, Internet. Etc.)

Democracy                                                      Space (in general) ;)

The more reasonable deduction is that all of these areas of understanding and other things above are inevitable developments. Their experimental discovery and progressive utilisation is a result of an industrial-academic culture being undisturbed and henceforth allowed to evolve. This academic / intellectual culture is one that can be employed to great benefit all over the world, that’s why it seems like such a gift.

The fact that ‘whites’ were the ‘leading’ bearers of technological development between the 15^th and 20^th centuries does not mean that they were the only ones who would have been able to do what was done. Besides, they weren’t. People of all nationalities contributed to the impressive technological and scientific developments of the past few centuries. Honestly, the highly applauded work of the great mathematicians, such as Euler, Euclid, Gauss, Archimedes, Fermat and Newton, could have been (and was) done by anyone with enough interest, resources, focus and self-belief. Ramanujan (1887) is surely proof enough.

Involved in this equation of person-based development were (and are) things other than a fantastical superiority gene in ‘whites’... too many to mention here. Any ‘people type’ that was able to industrialise their society, those without wars and without carelessness for academia, were working on advanced scientific conjecturing of some sort. This is proven by artifacts of many eras.

The argument can be made that ‘whites’ were the catalyst for increased development, but it would have to account for cultural, political and ecological differences which would self-defeat the ulterior argument of intrinsic superiority. 

Another argument seems more revealing; The development of anything logical is incremental and exponential until completion so - at later points in time, the rate of growth grows to dwarf previous rates, there is no way to argue against the citing that ‘whites’ came 'on top' at a good time in the road of human understanding. 

Documented discoveries, in an old-historical context, should not be relied on to determine the true time of discovery, just the documented time. Of course, our records are better today. Yet, there were many times before, which we know nothing of. So, how can we judge.

I’ll end there… Get on top of things. Understand what is untold. Like they did...

Why Human Classifications Are Stupid

Just a thought ..

If male and female cats and dogs are categorised by breed and race, does that not make you think that our classifications of humans, simplistically race or nationality, are incomplete and just wrong.

Religion Is A Joke (part 16/100)

How European Immigrants Behave In England - Examples Of Antisocial Negatives

More to come..

A Black Person Thinks X Ways (Generalisation Time Again)

# When a 'black' person sees an advertisement mentioning 'whiteness' in the context of cleanliness. (e.g. Toothpaste or laundry detergent commercials) they think of racial connotations and the superior value of the property of 'whiteness'.

Why I Move to Music - Why Don't They?

Confused, I look at someone with headphones on, I can hear the beats of their songs, yet they aren't moving. It seems that the act of moving to music through headphones is relegated to those who identify with what is known as a lower-class trend. I say that because, in my experience, all who moved to their music on public transport (in public but not on a dancefloor) were the sorts you could imagine knew, liked and hung out with 'black' people - and all of those who didn't, were not.

Is It Bad To Be Desperate?

Naturally, people always find ways to demonize things that are healthy, good and fair. It is simply being a part of society to unquestioningly partake in collective stupidity. Effectively, it is stupid to question collective stupidity. Which is totally stupid.

For some reason, it is a bad thing to be eager in a relationship, even when other people aren't watching. One can easily be too eager.

FYI I left a relationship that could be likened to a marriage and, No, I 'd never let her read this stuff.

People are trained to admire those who do not want them. As well as that training, there is an inherent desire in humans to gain the favour or affections of those who initially treat them with indifference; the wanting of importance is normal and of considerable effect. Enacted by all while being somehow treated as inappropriate.

So, when someone proclaims their attraction to someone, that someone will typically reject them. Yet, if the communication of the attraction is restricted to subtlety, the chance of agreement is higher. That seems odd, but makes sense when 'isms' and cultures are considered.

And, mate, its not just women who are responsible for this idiocy. If a girl offers a man her goods, be it on terms of sex or a relationship, the man leans toward declining or only partaking momentarily. From her assertiveness, he prejudges that she is either crazy, trouble or dirty in the worst way.

This is fukkkn stupid.

Amsterdam First Time Psychologist's Experience

"I checked out many of the souvenir shops, hoping to find one from France, where I was supposed to be. Looking for an anomaly..."

Wildly differing from the virtual prisons of London and New York, the pubs can serve alcohol at the early hour of 10am and prostitutes are available until after midnight. The tourist district is almost perfectly arranged, in a capitalist sort if way, with a misleading maze of shops housing the red light district that offers cannabis, sex and other sightseeing opportunities unavailable in the other, more offensive, regions of the world.

UKIP BREXIT PROPAGANDA - 2016 VOTE

A leaflet/PSA that UKIP sent out, in it's millions, to counteract the Pro-EU  propaganda sent out by Cameron's Tory government leading up to the EU referendum vote. 

If the majority vote is to stay in it will be nice to look back on the things that the masses chose to ignore.