Religion Is A Bad Joke (part 2/100)

Where Is The Good Grammar? Do writing Standards Matter Any More?

In English class at a homosexually charged 'grammar' school..

I was taught not to insert a comma before a ‘but’ or an ‘and’...
Also, I was taught to write 'he was neat and tidy. Regularly cleaning..' instead of 'he was neat, tidy. Regularly clea...'

Yet still, I see paid writers/ journalists/ cheekys doing things like this all the time. The editors condone it...

Why Men Haven’t Been Looking At You

{{Applies primarily to life in a city.}}

"Why don't men look at me?!?"

"Why don't you look at men?"

A near undeniable fact of life is that women walk around hoping for men to look at them - better yet: "hope to not go unnoticed".

Many women who are unfortunately saddled with unattractiveness are used to being undesired and not getting admiring stares from men so are fine with not getting that sort of attention. 'Attractive to some' or undeniably hot chicks on the other hand, get annoyed or actually feel sadness if they walk past six men on the street and not one looks at them. It is the old "affirmation of worth" (detailed soon) thing again.

Women are heartily focused on feeling desired -- as men are with being able to provide.

The thing is: 

If it was okay to stare at every attractive woman most (even gay) men would do so-- looking at women all day, every day. But sadly, we can't and, out of respect, shouldn't.

1ONE

Not only is it seen as 'pervy' and embarrassing but it is rude to many people; a jealous scowling girl who happens to see you, a hater, a sister’s brother. 

A woman in a belly top and skinny jeans will ask "what are you looking at?". A question that one can unwisely answer with a flirty assertion (which would most likely be responded to with an expression of veiled /blatant offence or disregard) or blunt honesty which is never recommended. 

Looking at women is less offensive and received with less displeasure in certain situations (e.g. in a nightclub, at a fashion show or on a beach).

When a man sees an attractive woman wearing tight 'jeggins', a face full of make up with her breasts out, walking like she's on a catwalk, he shouldn't look too blatantly because ironically it seems evident that nobody wants him to. Of course, not everyone should do as they please.

A perusing male must also be aware of the fact that certain women are forbidden from returning one's gaze; it is hopeless and possibly dangerous to attempt to exchange lustful gazes with Muslim women and others with unstable partners.

2TWO

A major majority of men will not, with sex in minds forefront, look longingly into the eyes of, smile at and/or attempt an introduction with an attractive woman he passes on the street due to experience: nearly all previous unsolicited shows of desire from the average man have been negatively received. 

Some women scream, some try to ignore, some laugh but all end up looking away and disappearing never to be seen again, leaving bad tastes and bruisings behind them. The only men who don't feel like that have had numerous positive experiences when previously looking at or approaching women so are not afraid of another failed attempt at a flirty interaction. Understandably, they are the minuscule minority - even good looking guys want to save their egos.

Often a man will find it difficult to look away from something beautiful that he will never touch or see again. Many men seek easier and less painful lives by never looking at such things.

When involving any kind of interaction, attempts to look at the majority of females are saddening (depressing), consistently bringing light to the fact that in reality the 'perving' male will only have a short list of sexual partners and intimate friendships (opposing his perhaps instinctual desire to have many), most if not all of which will be with less attractive women than those he could go outside to masochistically drool over. 

Negatively received attempts at eye contact will, after a certain point, only give the man even more misery and compound his sadness. As will brush-offs, looks of disgust, embarrassment and ridicule, false 'I didn't see you's' (what we have to do too) and lead-ons.

It is not a confidence issue, it is about being logical and learning from previous experiences. Why would you go somewhere you've never been wanted?

1.5

Teenagers are looking older than ever before so caution must be taken when spotting a female at her physical peak, she could be underaged.., making the unknowing observer a "paedophile" by peeping at what appears to be prime beef. You can never be sure, the girl of your dreams that you just saw walking by with her tiny untouched tummy, long height and protruding booty might be 15 and actually up for it.

Despite women evidently wanting to be looked at, the appreciation levels are even more polarised when considering male/female spectators than they are with hot males/ugly guys; most women care more about attention from other women than attention from random males.

So.. Why men don't look at you...

Imagine a huge room filled with gorgeous sports cars. Would you want to be in there if you believed that you would never drive, let alone own, one of those wonderful vehicles or anything like them? If yes, for how long? If no, would you even care?..

"Lady, you aren't worth looking at, I can barely give you a returned greeting. You won't give me anything and i'll just be looking at what I can't have, its painful. Tell me... do you like window shopping?"

"Yes, I do actually"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4UWxlVvT1A

To finish,

I request that all of you women be nicer to men, all men.. especially if you're available. Things will happen girl..

How To Listen To A Stutterer (Solved)

COMPREHENSION LESSON, LYRICAL WEAPO....

Understand that speaking with a stammerer isn’t ever likely to be a normal conversation. The person that you speak with doesn’t converse or think of talking in the same way as a fluent talker.

All NHS Doctors Are Rubbish

I used to see doctors as supreme humans of superior intellect, capable of healing the world...

Odd Trains: Extortionate and Unfair Rail Services

SHORT AS

"Whoever... Is this fair?"

Journey A takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles
Journey B takes 30 mins and travels a distance of 30 miles

Journey A is under more demand, yet has the same train frequency and number of carriages as Journey B, which gets fewer passengers and less demand.

Journey A costs 34 coins to take
Journey B costs 14 coins to take

Does this make sense?
Why and how are these companies allowed to do this?

In 2008, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
a fifth more than the price of a single fare.
In 2012, a ticket which could be used to return with within 30 days of purchase, costed
the same as two singles.

"Pubic transport in Great Britain...."

Contactless Payments Coming Up!!! - Diabolical Secrets

UPDATE: It is now 12th June 2014 and there are voice announcements playing on the buses saying "Cash will no longer be accepted on buses"... 

There is no reason for me to lie and there's no reason to not believe this (reverse as appropriate).

"Soo, an insider source has told me that the privatised Transport for London is currently (8/2013) training their staff to work with and administer 'Contactless Payment' scheduled to be in use "by 2016."

What Happened to the Music Industry?

(SHORT AS)

4 BENEFITS / REASONS FOR THE (EASTERN AND ALL) EUROPEAN INVASION

Over 30 Million British people feel that the European invasion is a bad thing but the occupation/theft has a few benefits..

Push for education and employment

The unending droves of “educated” European immigrants coming over and entering roles without lining them up before getting on the plane sends a message to the nationals about education, 'if you want a job you must go and get trained up'.

Experience is required more than ever before, no more are the days of being able to go to an employer requesting a job and the necessary but not-too-hard training, unless an apprenticeship, only available to under-24's, is miraculously acquired. Why is experience needed to stack shelves?

Many British citizens applying for 'quick' certifications in immigrant saturated professions such as security or construction (the most popular ones requiring only a few weeks of observing to complete) will find that their mandatory criminal records bureau (CRB) checks will bring up petty misdemeanours that render them ineligible. Fortunately, an immigrant can easily falsify their difficult to check history regarding both crime and experience.

Somehow most of these new European people have qualifications and/or plenty of satisfactory experience unlike many nationals,1 in 2 newly opened positions goes to an immigrant. With EE's filling up most of the lower and un-skilled roles, a lower chance of employment for nationals will result in greater demand for education and training. In addition, regularly being unable to understand people promotes the learning of other languages.

This increased demand will benefit the training and certification industry, eventually bringing an increase to governmental tax receipts and more stolen and wasted money.

Pleasing the EU and receiving those benefits

A few liberals argue that without immigration this country would halt in broken disarray. This notion was only true at certain times in history, e.g. after world wars, but is logically untrue today. During and after consecutive recessions and a poorly hidden employment crisis with, as well as other methods used by our government, large numbers being signed off from the unemployment register by being allocated part time positions by government and EU funded organisations, such large numbers of immigrants are certainly making life here harder for everyone outside of ‘big business’.

If open immigration was curtailed there would be many changes and transitions but none would be catastrophic; although immigration will always cause numbers and demand to increase, growing economies and infrastructures by force, development is possible in all circumstances, especially with the "superior minds of the British". 

Complex are the full terms of agreement between the EU and the British Government but it is clear and stated that the borders of England and its valuable benefits are no longer under British control and are freely open to more than half a billion Europeans. There must be some extraordinarily valuable benefit to being in the EU, so presumably this mass migration, along with a long list of other sacrificial obligations, ensures its receipt. The government and media keeps telling the public that there are financial benefits to EU inclusion -- if that is true, what happened to Spain or Greece?

All cuts are offset by increased demand. There are a few EU benefits in plain view such as funding for community services and large business investments but are England’s receipts bigger than her contributions?

Raise usage of businesses and open spaces

As ‘foreigners’ lounge blissfully on the previously underused benches strewn around, talking loud and drinking beer in public places, simply enjoying their surroundings with touristic novelty, things look very different. Previously, park benches were used mostly by school kids and alcoholics. This display of appreciation should make the British-born see their invaded country in a different light, as a place to utilise and enjoy as the immigrants do.

Local businesses thrive from a wealth of customers whilst riversides, parks and local entertainment businesses such as tours, museums and theatres are seeing increasing numbers of admissions. Neighbourhoods in England are more bustling in the daytime than ever before, if unfortunately with a lack of unified community and universal rapport. Despite the fact that, while accounting for only 20% of England's total population, 4 in 10 murder or rape suspects were born elsewhere -- surprisingly less at 1 in 3 in the cities -- the streets are thankfully being used more due to immigration, which is good.

Whiter immigrants and the future

The pale ‘caucasian’ division in England has been drifting uncomfortably away from a majority status, with “Others” floating over 50% and London only having 44% 'white' English in 2011. Without the current mass European immigration, the next generation of Brits would consist mostly of darker skinned people, changing the face, image and agenda of Europe's loudest country.

Before the mass European migration, It was expected that, in a few decades, British 'whites' would be the smallest racial demographic nationwide. In 2012, ‘whites’ were the minority in a number of places with 2 in every 5 public schools in London having an Asian majority and 44% nationwide having ‘non-white’ majorities. Many areas of England's cities are vigilante-policed by groups known as the 'Paki Panthers'. That is a secret.

England’s population has been progressing increasingly 'non-white' over the past 60 years, not decidedly a bad thing, so the recent influx of European 'whiteness' acts as a "safeguard". The majority of these immigrants are likely to be bothered to learn the language, pay taxes and integrate into 'big society' instead of burrowing into discriminating communities, cultural ignorance and untaxed finance. Also, a 'whiter' next generation will give the British government more of a reason to care about it's people.

These particular immigrants are an issue that we will be forced to endure and deal with in the most positive way.


SHARE THIS SHITEY GARBAGE

http://sosickofthislife.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/lying-uk-government-loves-eu.html

England

A Better Justice System

I know, I know that I should be hopeless about huge reforms of any law system. Too convoluted to edit, it seems that the law-books can only be expanded.